Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:55:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:55:08 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:51595 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:55:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:57:18 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Richard Stallman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new Message-ID: <20021013225718.GG2032@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Richard Stallman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 22 On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 06:48:22PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > The new restrictions on Bitkeeper, saying that people who contribute > to CVS or Subversion and even companies that distribute them cannot > even run Bitkeeper, have sparked outrage. While these specific Outrage == non kernel hacking related flamewar. I was not particularly happy with that fluff flying across the list (and quickly procmailed that thread to /dev/null), and I'm not particularly happy with your new message on that subject appearing here. In fact, I had my own questions about BK, and I prudently directed them elsewhere. Please keep traffic on this list technical in nature. If you've got actual code or a discussion thereof to post, I'd be happy to see it. Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/