Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933949Ab3HHId6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:33:58 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]:54427 "EHLO mail-oa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933761Ab3HHIdz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:33:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:03:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Tegra: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver From: Viresh Kumar To: Richard Zhao Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, Stephen Warren , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mike Turquette , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1061 Lines: 20 On 8 August 2013 14:01, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> This is the first attempt to get rid of tegra-cpufreq driver. This patchset >> tries to add supporting infrastructure for tegra to use cpufreq-cpu0 driver. > > If tegra has only 4-core fast cpu, I would agree with the patch set. But now > I'm not so sure. Tegra cpuquiet driver and cluster switch may need special > settings of cpufreq driver. I am not familiar with the latest happenings.. This change should be good enough for not breaking anything that is working with current tegra cpufreq driver.. If there is a new SoC with different needs then we can talk about it separately.. As that might not be able to use tegra-cpufreq driver anyway.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/