Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:44:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:44:44 -0400 Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.28]:42455 "HELO tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:44:43 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: Hirokazu Takahashi Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:50:02 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15786.23306.84580.323313@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36 In-Reply-To: message from Hirokazu Takahashi on Wednesday September 18 References: <20020918.171431.24608688.taka@valinux.co.jp> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 20.7.2 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D Hello, > > I ported the zerocopy NFS patches against linux-2.5.36. > hi, I finally got around to looking at this. It looks good. However it really needs the MSG_MORE support for udp_sendmsg to be accepted before there is any point merging the rpc/nfsd bits. Would you like to see if davem is happy with that bit first and get it in? Then I will be happy to forward the nfsd specific bit. I'm bit I'm not very sure about is the 'shadowsock' patch for having several xmit sockets, one per CPU. What sort of speedup do you get from this? How important is it really? NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/