Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:09:54 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, neilb@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
Message-ID: <20130808150954.GA30092@infradead.org>
References: <1375912471-5106-1-git-send-email-kmo@daterainc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1375912471-5106-1-git-send-email-kmo@daterainc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 748
Lines: 15

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:54:09PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> _However_, I have more patches (that depend on this patch series) to get
> that back - segment merging improvements that get rid of
> bi_seg_front_size, bi_seg_back_size, and bi_phys_segments. Once all that
> is in it should be a net reduction to the size of struct bio.

What is preventing you from sending those out as well?  While it's not
absolutely nessecary it would certainly be good if we'd avoid a struct
bio size regression.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/