Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 05:25:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 05:25:03 -0400 Received: from k100-128.bas1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net ([159.134.100.128]:59918 "EHLO corvil.com.") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 05:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3DAA8E79.70609@corvil.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:29:29 +0100 From: Padraig Brady Organization: Corvil Networks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wim Van Sebroeck CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers References: <20021013194041.A15609@medelec.uia.ac.be> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 21 Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Linus, > > I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features > that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel. > I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in > drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ? > Please comments. Well I think it's a good idea, as you can easily see what watchdogs are supported rather than referring to the (currently out of date) docs: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-02/0713.html P?draig. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/