Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:39:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:38:53 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:49874 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:38:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:36:06 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , David Gould , "Eric W. Biederman" , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vma limited swapin readahead Message-ID: <20010201143606.P11607@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010201112601.K11607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:53:33AM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:53:33AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > If we're under free memory shortage, "unlucky" readaheads will be harmful. I know, it's a balancing act. But given that even one successful readahead per read will halve the number of swapin seeks, the performance loss due to the extra scavenging has got to be bad to outweigh the benefit. Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/