Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030487Ab3HIH2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 03:28:46 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:42517 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030396Ab3HIH2p (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 03:28:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1376032991.2219.122.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1368760654-28754-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <520357DF.3030403@freescale.com> <20130808230630.GA14434@norris.computersforpeace.net> <1376020723.2219.105.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <52048565.1030707@gmail.com> <1376032991.2219.122.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 00:28:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] mtd: add datasheet's ECC information to nand_chip{} From: Brian Norris To: dedekind1@gmail.com Cc: Huang Shijie , dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vikram186@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1495 Lines: 32 On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 23:00 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: >> On 08/08/2013 08:58 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> > There are few minor issues in aiaiai, which I can fix if you hit them >> > and complain. Also, I did not invest much time in making the user >> > interface and experience very nice. But this can also be improved. >> >> One issue (possibly related to the above question?) was that aiaia >> complained (via checkpatch.pl) about no sign-offs when I processed using >> the input redirection method on a multi-message mbox. > > Yes, aiaiai runs checkpatch.pl for individual patches, and then to a > concatenated patch, and the latter does not have a signed-off-by. Fixing > is about adding --no-signoff to the right place. I can look at that if I run into it again and have the time to fix it. > I am a bit worried that at some point we may screw each other's work by > pushing things out at the same time. We should be very careful with > --force. I think by limiting our use of rebase and exercising care with --force, we should be fine. And if we do a 'fetch' just before, then the probability of a collision should be pretty low. Famous last words. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/