Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:37:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:37:14 -0400 Received: from medelec.uia.ac.be ([143.169.17.1]:38411 "EHLO medelec.uia.ac.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:37:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:41:58 +0200 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Dave Jones , Rob Radez , "Randy.Dunlap" , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers Message-ID: <20021014144158.A19209@medelec.uia.ac.be> References: <20021013234308.P23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021013215726.P16698@osinvestor.com> <20021014101209.A18123@medelec.uia.ac.be> <20021014122239.GA29240@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021014122239.GA29240@suse.de>; from davej@codemonkey.org.uk on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:22:39PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 23 On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:22:39PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > > Now I'm still left with my original question: wouldn't it be easier if we > > put all watchdog drivers in drivers/char/watchdog/ ? > > I'd say go for it. drivers/char/ is looking quite cluttered, and this > has the added advantage of decreasing the size of the Config.in and > config.help files too. I still see two options: 1) drivers/char/watchdog/ 2) drivers/watchdog/ Not sure what's best in this case... Greetings, Wim. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/