Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:18:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:18:03 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:32269 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:18:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:23:53 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Derrick J Brashear Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: AFS system call registration function (was Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3) Message-ID: <20021014152353.A16334@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Derrick J Brashear , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from shadow@dementia.org on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:58:00PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 23 On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:58:00PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > The version we have now uses long, so... (read on) I know.. > we have people with deployed utilities which call the afs system call, > because, well, it's the AFS system call. it would be good to maintain > compatibility with those, which means we should > a) keep using the same system call if we can > b) if so, keep using "long". AFS is currently not in mainline. You request a new feature, in this case an optional syscall that only was reserved previously. In general we don|t merge random stuff asis in the kernel just because it happens to exist. There is no reason you canb't add a sane API for openafs 1.3 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/