Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968376Ab3HJHmD (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2013 03:42:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:48917 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S968302Ab3HJHmB (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2013 03:42:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 00:41:57 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Huang Shijie Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mtd: gpmi: update the ecc step size for mtd_info{} Message-ID: <20130810074156.GB3467@norris.computersforpeace.net> References: <1368607606-4344-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1368607606-4344-5-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368607606-4344-5-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2263 Lines: 51 On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:46:46PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > update the ecc step size when we have already get the right value. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > index 53180da..bc598e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c > @@ -1598,6 +1598,7 @@ static int gpmi_pre_bbt_scan(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) > /* Adjust the ECC strength according to the chip. */ > this->nand.ecc.strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; > this->mtd.ecc_strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; > + this->mtd.ecc_step = this->bch_geometry.ecc_chunk_size; Why do you need a special case here for gpmi-nand? GPMI should be initializing nand_ecc_ctrl.size (this->ecc.size) to something meaningful instead of directly setting to 1. Then nand_base will take care of setting mtd.ecc_step. Along the same line, you shouldn't need to directly override mtd.ecc_strength here; you should be setting this->ecc.strength appropriately. I see several instances here where gpmi-nand is hacking around nand_base, rather than using its intended infrastructure. The right way seems to be to avoid nand_scan() directly but instead to use nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail() separately (that's what they're exported for) so that you can initialize any geometry-related options before nand_scan_tail() does the last steps. In the end, you shouldn't be needing to override this->scan_bbt at all, since you really intend to use the default implementation; you just are doing this to hack around your issues. In fact, I think every use of nand_default_bbt() outside of nand_base is a design mistake. > this->mtd.bitflip_threshold = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; > > /* NAND boot init, depends on the gpmi_set_geometry(). */ > Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/