Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:09:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:09:36 -0400 Received: from 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.136]:54166 "EHLO 2-136.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:09:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:15:02 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Shawn cc: Christoph Hellwig , Michael Clark , Mark Peloquin , , , Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42 In-Reply-To: <20021014092048.A27417@q.mn.rr.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 20 On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Shawn wrote: > Having said all that, given that your premises are true regarding the > code design problems you have with EVMS, you have a valid point about > including it in mainline. The question is, is this good enough to ignore > having a logical device management system?!? You're acting like EVMS was the only logical volume manager out there. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/