Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:50:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:50:30 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:54546 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:50:29 -0400 Message-ID: <3DAAF717.6030306@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:55:51 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rms@gnu.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1000 Lines: 25 Richard, By this point, BitKeeper users will continue to be BitKeeper users and BitKeeper haters will continue to be BitKeeper haters. No one's mind is changing about BK these days -- either they like it or they don't. The debate has reached the level of emacs vs. vi, pro/anti-abortion, gun control, . No one's mind is being changed, there's just a lot of energy wasted on pointless ranting. Thus, you should have seen even before hitting 'Send' that your message was nothing but a lot of hot air, slashdot fodder and a troll. Would it not be logically more productive to direct FSF efforts instead towards funding Arch or SubVersion development? Jeff, a humble BitKeeper user and kernel developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/