Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754735Ab3HKSgr (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:36:47 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.abv.bg ([194.153.145.99]:43956 "EHLO smtp-out.abv.bg" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754435Ab3HKSgm (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:36:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=smtp-out; d=abv.bg; c=simple; q=dns; b=I40PN6RzkoD0pT5LPi22F8jFaE8ZpkywC5BCsp9OYFO2DGWM+8xVoX2v1RwOVXcX2 UztfULrvJH+oZgKjh6Umjm9jjrMNkogVfocx/UQYJreOpvFqk7wcvKLv9LkSojPvM8F rNRwuR+DQDcqGcVn28jkHeD1llauDdOzI7BaIwg= Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 21:36:40 +0300 (EEST) From: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQstCw0LnQu9C+INCU0LjQvNC40YLRgNC+0LI=?= To: Dave Martin Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, tony@atomide.com, nm@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <2121638991.49538.1376246200421.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: AbvMail 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 130.204.50.168 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3225 Lines: 85 >-------- Оригинално писмо -------- >От: Dave Martin >Относно: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 >До: Pali Rohár >Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Август 5 16:29:44 EEST > > >On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> Here is new version (v3) of omap secure part patch: >> >> Other secure functions omap_smc1() and omap_smc2() calling instruction smc #0 >> but Nokia RX-51 board needs to call smc #1 for PPA access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár >> --- >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h >> index 0e72917..c4586f4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h >> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ >> extern u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, >> u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4); >> extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs); >> +extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 pargs); >> extern phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void); >> extern int omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void); >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S >> index f6441c1..7bbc043 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S >> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ >> /* >> - * OMAP44xx secure APIs file. >> + * OMAP34xx and OMAP44xx secure APIs file. >> * >> * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc. >> * Written by Santosh Shilimkar >> * >> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Ivaylo Dimitrov >> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Pali Rohár >> * >> * This program is free software,you can redistribute it and/or modify >> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> @@ -54,6 +56,23 @@ ENTRY(omap_smc2) >> ldmfd sp!, {r4-r12, pc} >> ENDPROC(omap_smc2) >> >> +/** >> + * u32 omap_smc3(u32 service_id, u32 process_id, u32 flag, u32 pargs) >> + * Low level common routine for secure HAL and PPA APIs via smc #1 >> + * r0 - @service_id: Secure Service ID >> + * r1 - @process_id: Process ID >> + * r2 - @flag: Flag to indicate the criticality of operation >> + * r3 - @pargs: Physical address of parameter list >> + */ >> +ENTRY(omap_smc3) >> + stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} >> + mov r12, r0 @ Copy the secure service ID >> + mov r6, #0xff @ Indicate new Task call >> + dsb @ Memory Barrier > >Can you explain _why_ the barrier is there? The reader doesn't need to >be told that a barrier instruction is a barrier instruction. > >Cheers >---Dave > Hi Dave, Would quoting Santosh's explanation "DSBs were needed on OMAP for power sequencing." do the job? Something like "@ Needed on OMAP for power sequencing" instead of "@ Memory Barrier". I want to be sure I correctly understand your requirement. Regards, Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/