Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:27:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:27:39 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:38300 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:27:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021014.122628.63756731.davem@redhat.com> To: bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, buytenh@gnu.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.42 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200210142129.56824.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be> References: <200210142058.53355.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be> <20021014.120200.77420883.davem@redhat.com> <200210142129.56824.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 684 Lines: 18 From: Bart De Schuymer Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:29:56 +0200 You were the one who asked for that patch. I asked for the patch to be cleaned up to eliminate the net/ipv4/*.c hacking. :) This brings me to another question: I've been told it is the general concensus that this bridge firewall should be compiled in the kernel if CONFIG_NETFILTER=y. I don't have any strong opinion here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/