Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:36:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:36:29 -0400 Received: from ip68-13-110-204.om.om.cox.net ([68.13.110.204]:23686 "EHLO dad.molina") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:36:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:41:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Thomas Molina X-X-Sender: tmolina@dad.molina To: Andy Pfiffer cc: Robert Love , Eric Blade , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Evolution and 2.5.x In-Reply-To: <1034618822.1995.47.camel@andyp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1167 Lines: 26 > > See this thread: > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution-hackers/2002-June/004841.html > > > > It is indeed broken in 2.5 and it is not, for once, our fault. This > > thread and other discussion seem to point out it is a bug in ORBit. > > > > Robert Love > > I spent some time trying to track this problem down, but reached a wall > due to the size and nature of the ChangeSet. > > The bitkeeper ChangeSet that made Evolution's address book hang when > trying to compose a new message when run on 2.5.x kernels was 1.262.2.2. I've read this thread and I'm confused. Is this seen as a problem with Evolution, ORBit, or the 2.5 kernel? If it is seen as a possible kernel problem, I'll add it to my problem report status page and track it. If I track it, Eric Blade will get a weekly email asking whether he's still seeing the problem, at least until I'm told to drop it, or no one responds. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/