Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:33:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:33:02 -0400 Received: from rom.cscaper.com ([216.19.195.129]:29844 "HELO mail.cscaper.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:33:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Known 'issues' about 2.4.19... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Joseph N. Hall" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Mime-version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:41 -0700 X-mailer: Mailer from Hell v1.0 Message-Id: <20021014193301Z262118-32597+1769@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1036 Lines: 24 > [...] I recently found out its IDE > subsystem doesn't get along too well with VIA chipsets (replaced my old > mobo for a VT8233 based recently and probls started surfacing). Personally the best stability I've had lately is with 2.4.17. I was never able to get IDE working right on my KT333 based Soyo Dragon Ultra Platinum under 2.4.19 or later. Swapped it for an iWill (ALi), but "I will" try the Soyo again later because it's a nicer board ... I forget whether the problems went back to 2.4.18 or not. Also my dual CPU pIII box (ASUS CUV4X-DLS) freezes silently after 1-3 days uptime running a redhat style (modular) 2.4.18+ kernel. I reverted to a mostly monolithic 2.4.17 and have > 1 week of uptime ... I will see sometime if a newer monolithic kernel will fly. -joseph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/