Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262169AbSJNUSj>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:18:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262176AbSJNUSi>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:18:38 -0400
Received: from inrete-46-20.inrete.it ([81.92.46.20]:47341 "EHLO
	pdamail1-pdamail.inrete.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262169AbSJNUSh>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:18:37 -0400
Message-ID: <3DAB27F2.F8A00FE1@inrete.it>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:24:18 +0200
From: Daniele Lugli <genlogic@inrete.it>
Organization: General Logic srl
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-rthal5 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Davis <fdavis112@juno.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unhappy with current.h
References: <20021014.161535.17120.336861@webmail4.nyc.untd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 754
Lines: 19

Frank Davis wrote:
> 
> Daniele,
>   Its easier for you to modify your code than to ask the kernel developers to modify a commonly used, intangled macro within the Linux kernel. :)
> 
> Regards,
> Frank

Thank you for your calm reply. You're right, and in fact that's what I
did before sending my mail. I'm not asking to modify an existing and
(unhappily) well-established kernel file; I am only giving a suggestion
for the future - if a common mortal human being can give suggestions.

Regards, Daniele Lugli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/