MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130813052036.GA11640@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308111151210.2072@localhost6.localdomain6>
	<20130811155640.GA10070@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1308111811440.2072@localhost6.localdomain6>
	<20130813052036.GA11640@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:45:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJJAcoe+GpRYqHyu1xctRaUnPXf4CP8=PTt=svJzJFtBjfqxrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: question about netif_rx
From: David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@gmail.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, grant.likely@linaro.org,
        rob.herring@calxeda.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1071
Lines: 30

Hello,
what is the current state of checksum offloading support has to do
with it ? maybe you meant current state of NAPI support ?

regards,
DS

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> wrote:
> Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> :
>> Fran?ois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> :
> [...]
>> > Can you send a netif_receive_skb replacement patch for it ?
>>
>> Just to be sure, I just replace netif_rx by netif_receive_skb, nothing
>> else?
>
> Yes. It should imho be fine with a comment incluing your analysis and a
> few words about the current state of checksum offloading support.
>
> --
> Ueimor
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/