Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:30:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:30:08 -0400 Received: from msp-65-29-16-62.mn.rr.com ([65.29.16.62]:3769 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:30:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:34:29 -0500 From: Shawn To: Rik van Riel Cc: Shawn , Christoph Hellwig , Michael Clark , Mark Peloquin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42 Message-ID: <20021014163429.A28737@q.mn.rr.com> References: <20021014092048.A27417@q.mn.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:15:02PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 938 Lines: 26 I hadn't heard comments yet that anyone thought of dm as ready yet. This may be the case by now. On 10/14, Rik van Riel said something like: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Shawn wrote: > > > Having said all that, given that your premises are true regarding the > > code design problems you have with EVMS, you have a valid point about > > including it in mainline. The question is, is this good enough to ignore > > having a logical device management system?!? > > You're acting like EVMS was the only logical volume manager out there. -- Shawn Leas core@enodev.com My grandfather invented Cliff's Notes. It all started back in 1912... well, to make a long story short... -- Stephen Wright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/