Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:43:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:43:41 -0400 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:8144 "EHLO mailout04.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:43:40 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Oliver Neukum To: Christoph Hellwig , Shawn Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:48:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Michael Clark , Mark Peloquin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20021014092048.A27417@q.mn.rr.com> <20021014172137.D19897@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20021014172137.D19897@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210142348.29628.oliver@neukum.name> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 882 Lines: 22 Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 18:21 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:20:48AM -0500, Shawn wrote: > > Having said all that, given that your premises are true regarding the > > code design problems you have with EVMS, you have a valid point about > > including it in mainline. The question is, is this good enough to ignore > > having a logical device management system?!? > > It is not good enough to ignore it. It is good enough to postpone > integration for 2.7. No, that is not an option. Either evms or lvm2 it must be. Switching later might be difficult. So it has to be decided quite soon. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/