Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:46:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:46:00 -0400 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77]:30626 "EHLO pimout1-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:45:59 -0400 Message-Id: <200210142151.g9ELpiLE101376@pimout1-ext.prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:33:59 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200210132242.g9DMgVng334662@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net> <3DAA0708.1030701@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <3DAA0708.1030701@namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 25 On Sunday 13 October 2002 07:51 pm, Hans Reiser wrote: > Call it forcedumount(). > > What apps need to know about how to call it besides umount anyway? > > Not a lot that need a lot of worry..... Actually, looking at the umount.c user space app thingy, it turns out there's a umount2() glibc call that doesn't have a man page associated with it. (Suspected there might be, since the existing -f had to get into the kernel some how...) The new patch Hugh Dickens posted looks interesting, but of course real life has decided to intrude for a couple of days, looks like... :) > Hans Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/