Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:30:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:30:39 -0400 Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.83]:46468 "EHLO mailout07.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:30:29 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Oliver Neukum To: Shawn Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:35:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Shawn , Michael Clark , Mark Peloquin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200210142348.29628.oliver@neukum.name> <20021014165534.C28737@q.mn.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20021014165534.C28737@q.mn.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210150035.14923.oliver@neukum.name> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 817 Lines: 22 > If neither LVM2 or EVMS are truly ready, no one is beholden to anyone > else as to anything's inclusion in mainline. > > It's a matter of marketing so say whether Linux has volume management. > If all the distros have LVM in some form, then "Linux has an LVM". So, > no one can really say "Linux doesn't have an LVM so it's not enterprise > ready. This is not true. Something has to be in the mainline, so that bugs can be fixed. This too important to be left to distributors. Besides people who compile their own kernels are not that unimportant. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/