Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758597Ab3HMTNZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:13:25 -0400 Received: from smtprelay-b31.telenor.se ([213.150.131.20]:34499 "EHLO smtprelay-b31.telenor.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757824Ab3HMTNY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:13:24 -0400 X-SENDER-IP: [85.230.171.181] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvtCAA+FClJV5qu1PGdsb2JhbABbgwaIV7cPgSEXAwEBAQE4NYIkAQEEAScTHCMFCwgDISUPBSUKGhMeh2wKuDAWkCYHgxt2A5QNg1aGOIx7gTw6 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,872,1367964000"; d="scan'208";a="373972662" From: rydberg@euromail.se Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:17:31 +0200 To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Benjamin Tissoires , Jiri Kosina , Stephane Chatty , Mika Westerberg , Alexander Holler , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] HID: Use existing parser for pre-scanning the report descriptors Message-ID: <20130813191731.GA8391@polaris.bitmath.org> References: <1376405889-12378-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <1376405889-12378-2-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1376405889-12378-2-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8015 Lines: 260 Hi Benjamin, thanks for the patches, things are looking a lot better this way. > hid_scan_report() implements its own HID report descriptor parsing. It was > fine until we added the SENSOR_HUB detection. It is going to be even worse > with the detection of Win 8 certified touchscreen, as this detection > relies on a special feature and on the report_size and report_count fields. It was fine with sensors added as well. You seem to have found a reasonable way to add support for all the tags, but there is a rationale for the current scanner that may not have been addressed in this patch: it is robust against parse errors. This is particularly important for devices which later tweak the report, often in order to parse properly. Please find some further comments inline. > We can use the existing HID parser in hid-core for hid_scan_report() > by re-using the code from hid_open_report(). hid_parser_global, > hid_parser_local and hid_parser_reserved does not have any side effects. > We just need to reimplement the MAIN_ITEM callback to have a proper > parsing without side effects. > > Instead of directly overwriting the ->group field, this patch introduce > a ->flags field and then decide which group the device belongs to, > depending on the whole parsing (not just the local item). This will be > useful for Win 8 multitouch devices, which are multitouch devices and > Win 8 certified (so 2 flags to check). > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires > --- > drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > include/linux/hid.h | 4 ++ > 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > index 3efe19f..d8cdb0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > @@ -677,10 +677,49 @@ static u8 *fetch_item(__u8 *start, __u8 *end, struct hid_item *item) > return NULL; > } > > -static void hid_scan_usage(struct hid_device *hid, u32 usage) > +static void hid_scan_input_usage(struct hid_parser *parser, u32 usage) > { > if (usage == HID_DG_CONTACTID) > - hid->group = HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH; > + parser->flags |= HID_FLAG_MULTITOUCH; Did you consider reusing the group flags, e.g., parser->groups |= (1 << HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH)? This change could be made regardless of the parser logic. > +} > + > +static void hid_scan_open_collection(struct hid_parser *parser, unsigned type) We are not really opening anything here, so perhaps hid_scan_collection would suffice. > +{ > + if (parser->global.usage_page == HID_UP_SENSOR && > + type == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL) > + parser->flags |= HID_FLAG_SENSOR_HUB; > +} > + > +static int hid_scan_main(struct hid_parser *parser, struct hid_item *item) > +{ > + __u32 data; > + int i; > + > + data = item_udata(item); > + > + switch (item->tag) { > + case HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_BEGIN_COLLECTION: > + hid_scan_open_collection(parser, data & 0xff); > + break; > + case HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_END_COLLECTION: > + break; > + case HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_INPUT: > + for (i = 0; i < parser->local.usage_index; i++) > + hid_scan_input_usage(parser, parser->local.usage[i]); > + break; > + case HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_OUTPUT: > + break; > + case HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_FEATURE: > + break; > + default: > + hid_err(parser->device, "unknown main item tag 0x%x\n", > + item->tag); > + } > + > + /* Reset the local parser environment */ > + memset(&parser->local, 0, sizeof(parser->local)); > + > + return 0; > } > > /* > @@ -690,49 +729,65 @@ static void hid_scan_usage(struct hid_device *hid, u32 usage) > */ > static int hid_scan_report(struct hid_device *hid) > { > - unsigned int page = 0, delim = 0; > + struct hid_parser *parser; > + struct hid_item item; > __u8 *start = hid->dev_rdesc; > __u8 *end = start + hid->dev_rsize; > - unsigned int u, u_min = 0, u_max = 0; > - struct hid_item item; > + int ret; > + static int (*dispatch_type[])(struct hid_parser *parser, > + struct hid_item *item) = { > + hid_scan_main, > + hid_parser_global, > + hid_parser_local, > + hid_parser_reserved > + }; > > - hid->group = HID_GROUP_GENERIC; > + parser = vzalloc(sizeof(struct hid_parser)); Argh, I realize it is inevitable for this patch, but it still makes my eyes bleed. The parser takes quite a bit of memory... > + if (!parser) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + parser->device = hid; > + > + ret = -EINVAL; > while ((start = fetch_item(start, end, &item)) != NULL) { > - if (item.format != HID_ITEM_FORMAT_SHORT) > - return -EINVAL; > - if (item.type == HID_ITEM_TYPE_GLOBAL) { > - if (item.tag == HID_GLOBAL_ITEM_TAG_USAGE_PAGE) > - page = item_udata(&item) << 16; > - } else if (item.type == HID_ITEM_TYPE_LOCAL) { > - if (delim > 1) > - break; > - u = item_udata(&item); > - if (item.size <= 2) > - u += page; > - switch (item.tag) { > - case HID_LOCAL_ITEM_TAG_DELIMITER: > - delim += !!u; > - break; > - case HID_LOCAL_ITEM_TAG_USAGE: > - hid_scan_usage(hid, u); > - break; > - case HID_LOCAL_ITEM_TAG_USAGE_MINIMUM: > - u_min = u; > - break; > - case HID_LOCAL_ITEM_TAG_USAGE_MAXIMUM: > - u_max = u; > - for (u = u_min; u <= u_max; u++) > - hid_scan_usage(hid, u); > - break; > + > + if (item.format != HID_ITEM_FORMAT_SHORT) { > + hid_err(hid, "unexpected long global item\n"); I do not think we should be verbose on errors during scan, for the reason stated at the top. Since this goes also for the global parser functions, we might have a problem. > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (dispatch_type[item.type](parser, &item)) { > + hid_err(hid, "item %u %u %u %u parsing failed\n", > + item.format, (unsigned)item.size, > + (unsigned)item.type, (unsigned)item.tag); Ditto. > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (start == end) { > + if (parser->local.delimiter_depth) { > + hid_err(hid, "unbalanced delimiter at end of report description\n"); Robustness, see top. > + goto out; > } > - } else if (page == HID_UP_SENSOR && > - item.type == HID_ITEM_TYPE_MAIN && > - item.tag == HID_MAIN_ITEM_TAG_BEGIN_COLLECTION && > - (item_udata(&item) & 0xff) == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL) > - hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB; At the end of the day, It may be best to simply extend this branch as the main item type and add whatever you need to detect win8 from there. > + ret = 0; > + goto out; > + } > } > > - return 0; > + hid_err(hid, "item fetching failed at offset %d\n", (int)(end - start)); > +out: > + switch (parser->flags) { > + case HID_FLAG_MULTITOUCH: > + hid->group = HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH; > + break; > + case HID_FLAG_SENSOR_HUB: > + hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB; > + break; > + default: > + hid->group = HID_GROUP_GENERIC; > + } Looks odd to switch on flags, but it works pretty well with the rest of the patches in the series. > + > + vfree(parser); > + return ret; > } > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/hid.h b/include/linux/hid.h > index 5a4e789..7d823db 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hid.h > +++ b/include/linux/hid.h > @@ -533,6 +533,9 @@ static inline void hid_set_drvdata(struct hid_device *hdev, void *data) > #define HID_GLOBAL_STACK_SIZE 4 > #define HID_COLLECTION_STACK_SIZE 4 > > +#define HID_FLAG_MULTITOUCH 0x0001 > +#define HID_FLAG_SENSOR_HUB 0x0002 > + > struct hid_parser { > struct hid_global global; > struct hid_global global_stack[HID_GLOBAL_STACK_SIZE]; > @@ -541,6 +544,7 @@ struct hid_parser { > unsigned collection_stack[HID_COLLECTION_STACK_SIZE]; > unsigned collection_stack_ptr; > struct hid_device *device; > + unsigned flags; > }; > > struct hid_class_descriptor { > -- > 1.8.3.1 > Thanks, Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/