Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759373Ab3HMWUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:20:11 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:12668 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759255Ab3HMWUI (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:20:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,873,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="41891402" Message-ID: <1376432405.9273.54.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/hvc: If we use xen_raw_printk let it also work on HVM guests. From: Ian Campbell To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: , Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:20:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1376427570.9273.39.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> References: <1376060133-6382-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1376425904.9273.25.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <20130813205332.GA10243@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1376427570.9273.39.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1706 Lines: 50 On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > What it should be is: > > > > > > > > void xen_raw_console_write(const char *str) > > > > { > > > > - dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str)); > > > > + if (!xen_domain()) > > > > + return; > > > > + > > > > + if (xen_pv_domain()) > > xen_domain() > > > > > > + dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str)); > > > > + else if (xen_hvm_domain() || xen_cpuid_base()) { > > > > else if (xen_cpuid_base()) { > > > > > > + /* The hyperpage has not been setup yet. */ > > > > + int i, len = strlen(str); > > > > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > > > > + outb(str[i], 0xe9); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > And then that should adhere to what I wrote up. > > I think it does too. Except as Daniel notes in <520A7145.5010306@tycho.nsa.gov> for unrelated reasons: > HVM guests can still use the PV output - they just need to use the console > write hypercall instead of the HVM I/O port. I would think that PVH guests > would default to using the hypercall as it is more efficient (it takes a > string rather than one character per write). > > Actually, checking... the console_io hypercall would need to be added to > the hvm_hypercall{32,64}_table for an HVM guest to be able to use it; they > currently must use the I/O port. I didn't check the PVH patches. Or did you actually try this code and it worked? Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/