Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758630Ab3HMXzY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:55:24 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]:54638 "EHLO mail-vc0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756998Ab3HMXzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:55:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130813231020.GA22667@asylum.americas.sgi.com> References: <1375465467-40488-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> <1376344480-156708-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> <520A6DFC.1070201@sgi.com> <20130813231020.GA22667@asylum.americas.sgi.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:55:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WPv1Wvv-5BTSGu9X12pvtElDycU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/5] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator From: Linus Torvalds To: Nathan Zimmer Cc: Mike Travis , Peter Anvin , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Robin Holt , Rob Landley , Daniel J Blueman , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Yinghai Lu , Mel Gorman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 17 On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nathan Zimmer wrote: > > The only mm structure we are adding to is a new flag in page->flags. > That didn't seem too much. I don't agree. I see only downsides, and no upsides. Doing the same thing *without* the downsides seems straightforward, so I simply see no reason for any extra flags or tests at runtime. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/