Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 20:17:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 20:17:12 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:18089 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 20:17:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:20:27 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: colpatch@us.ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" cc: linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Message-ID: <2004595005.1034616026@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> References: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 14 >> 4) An ordered zone list is probably the more natural mapping. > See my comments above about per zone/memblk. And you reemphasize my point, how do we order the zone lists in such a way that a user of the API can easily know/find out what zone #5 is? Could you explain how that problem is different from finding out what memblk #5 is ... I don't see the difference? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/