Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:00:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:00:10 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:20944 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:00:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 From: john stultz To: Matt Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum In-Reply-To: <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com> References: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> <2004595005.1034616026@[10.10.2.3]> <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 14 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 854 Lines: 21 On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 17:38, Matthew Dobson wrote: > Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1 > on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely > look the same on most architectures, too. Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption. There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as well. thanks -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/