Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:48:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:48:32 -0400 Received: from [12.36.124.2] ([12.36.124.2]:56237 "EHLO intranet.resilience.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:48:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20021015043722.A9562@wotan.suse.de> References: <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C44604758B78@orsmsx113.jf.intel.com> <20021015043722.A9562@wotan.suse.de> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:54:15 -0700 To: Andi Kleen , "Feldman, Scott" From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) Cc: "'Ben Greear'" , linux-kernel , "'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1045 Lines: 21 At 4:37am +0200 10/15/02, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Ben, I checked the datasheet for the part shown in the lspci dump, and it >> shows an operating temperature of 0-55 degrees C. You said you measured 50 >> degrees C, so you're within the safe range. Did the fans help? > >The thermometer he used likely showed a much lower temperature than what was >actually on the die. 5-10 C more are not unlikely. It's hard to measure chip >temperatures accurately without an on die thermal diode or special kit. >So I would expect that when an external normal thermometer showed 50C >it was already operating out of spec. The datasheet's for the card, so the operating temperature is surely ambient, not die temperature. "Ambient measured how?" would be a reasonable question, though. -- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/