Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932403Ab3HNMtV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:49:21 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41539 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932287Ab3HNMtU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:49:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:49:04 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Peter Maydell Cc: Guenter Roeck , Paul Gortmaker , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Message-ID: <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1523 Lines: 31 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it, > >> or do we need a test on real hardware ? > > > > Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing > > to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another > > change to this. > > > > Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so > > it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff. > > Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we > land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been > thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my > desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing > (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually > boot a kernel). Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview. The alternative is - I have both the Realview EB and Versatile PB926 here, but no backplane (it wasn't deemed to be necessary for me to have such a thing.) If someone wants to donate a backplane... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/