Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:10:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:10:10 -0400 Received: from [66.70.28.20] ([66.70.28.20]:51217 "EHLO maggie.piensasolutions.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:10:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:13:32 +0200 From: DervishD To: "Joseph N. Hall" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Known 'issues' about 2.4.19... Message-ID: <20021015081332.GF46@DervishD> References: <20021014193301Z262118-32597+1769@vger.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20021014193301Z262118-32597+1769@vger.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades Net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 20 Hi Joseph :) > Personally the best stability I've had lately is with 2.4.17. Me not. Best stability I have with 2.4.18. 2.4.17 did something with CD-recorder and the bus got stuck a couple of times. I suppose that there is no great difference between 17 and 18. > Also my dual CPU pIII box (ASUS CUV4X-DLS) freezes silently after > 1-3 days uptime running a redhat style (modular) 2.4.18+ kernel. Ooops, this is worse :((( Thanks for your answer :)) Ra?l - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/