Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:23:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:23:13 -0400 Received: from oris.opensource.jp ([218.44.239.73]:28124 "EHLO oris.opensource.gr.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:23:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:29:00 +0900 Message-ID: <8065w482zn.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Osamu Tomita Cc: "'GOTO Masanori '" , "'LKML '" , "'Linus Torvalds '" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add support for PC-9800 architecture In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 23 At Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:24:47 +0900, Osamu Tomita wrote: > > Splitting one patch into small patchsets is good idea for me, like > > each driver parts and mach-pc9800 depending part, arch/i386 generic > > part... > I'll try to split patch and resend within a week. Good news :-) > > In addition some place seems to need cleanup, for example ide.c, > > 3c569b/at1000 (is it difficult to merge with 3c509.c/at1700?), etc. > Indeed, 3c569b into 3c509.c and at1000 into at1700 are probably okey. > But, I think ide.c patch is very simple. > So, no-need to cleanup, isn't it? Oh well, it's unnecessary to modify for ide.c, it's my misdescription. -- gotom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/