Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759500Ab3HORKI (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:10:08 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:47422 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759175Ab3HORKD (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:10:03 -0400 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jonas Bonn , Michal Simek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1376586580-5409-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1374492747-13879-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> References: <1374492747-13879-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2013 17:09:58.0877 (UTC) FILETIME=[4587C8D0:01CE99DA] X-MC-Unique: 113081518100000901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id r7FHB848017240 Content-Length: 1841 Lines: 48 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Hi, This series needs to be prepended with the original series[1][2][3] Except the first patch in the original series(which is merged into this as last patch), there is no other change(apart from function signature) I am posting only this part for feedback separately for review as the original series is already reviewed. Once this part is review and aknowledged I will combine the complete series and post it. Hi Rob, Since the compatible 'ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s' is one-off and for historical reasons, if future architectures are adhering to ePAPR, IMO having a weak definition of arch_of_cpu_get_node as you suggested could lead to it's misuse in future. So I didn't take that approach. Regards, Sudeep Sudeep KarkadaNagesha (4): microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h | 3 -- arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h | 3 -- arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h | 3 -- arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 43 +---------------- drivers/of/base.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/cpu.h | 1 + include/linux/of.h | 7 +++ 7 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- 1.8.1.2 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/15/128 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/17/341 [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/219 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/