Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752685Ab3HOV6e (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:58:34 -0400
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:52884 "EHLO
	smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751486Ab3HOV6d (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:58:33 -0400
Message-ID: <520D4F07.8000609@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:58:31 -0700
From: Hanumant Singh <hanumant@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add support for MSM TLMM pinmux
References: <1374702089-2832-1-git-send-email-hanumant@codeaurora.org> <CAJAp7OjbJwaH8SFdSwDU4VLwTAY1PfDWy1S+yF05=oPuUApvNA@mail.gmail.com> <CACRpkdbNpVUV9B1p1Cp5q2vJtQ78zhqsDBss2k28=cxF9Mn7pg@mail.gmail.com> <520D1363.3090708@codeaurora.org> <20130815215004.GC4035@joshc.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130815215004.GC4035@joshc.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2326
Lines: 50

On 8/15/2013 2:50 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:44:03AM -0700, Hanumant Singh wrote:
>> On 8/14/2013 12:29 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Hanumant Singh <hanumant@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a general note on the patch, the pins and pin groups are defined by
>>>> the soc, I'm therefore not convinced that these should be configured
>>> >from the devicetree. It's at least not how it's done in other
>>>> platforms.
>>>
>>> Now we are three people sayin the same thing so it should
>>> be a good hint to the implementer :-)
>>>
>>
>> Ok i can switch to using pin groups defined in per soc files.
>> But in our case we have one soc going into different types of boards.
>> (atleast 3). In each of the boards the same external devices end up using
>> different pins. For ex camera on board 1 uses different pin group
>> then the same camera on board 2. Both having the same SOC.
>> So in this case the design would be to have all possible pin groups
>> for different boards enumerated in the same soc-pinctrl.c file?
>>
>> Also in this implementation I will have.
>> 1) pinctrl-msm.c => DT parsing and interface to framework.
>> 2) pinctrl-msm-tlmm<version>.c => Register programming and pin types
>> supported by a particular TLMM pinmux version.
>
> It isn't clear to me what you are trying to separate out between 1) and
> 2).  Seems like there should only be pinctrl-msm-tlmm<version>.c.
>
The idea is that we should be able to plug in the next TLMM version 4, 
with the pintypes that it supports and its register programming 
semantics without any changes to the DT parsing or interface to the 
framework. The DT information describes the states of the pingroups.
How we handle them with respect to the pinctrl framework, does not 
change with different versions of the TLMM.

Thanks
Hanumant

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/