Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777Ab3HOWYU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:24:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:59161 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889Ab3HOWYS (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:24:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <520D53CA.6040807@roeck-us.net> References: <5207B3C3.9080508@roeck-us.net> <20130811220450.GY23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net> <20130813034054.GA18218@roeck-us.net> <20130815175428.GA18580@roeck-us.net> <20130815205044.GA21599@roeck-us.net> <520D53CA.6040807@roeck-us.net> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:23:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Paul Gortmaker , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , QEMU Developers , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 17 On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck wrote: > But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so, > we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up. > Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today > I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's > when they show up. Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing. It's only one extra line... -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/