Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754392Ab3HPC0d (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:26:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:47468 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754288Ab3HPC02 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:26:28 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Steven Miao Subject: [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:55:02 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2940 Lines: 91 Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on frequency change, this one removes it from this driver. Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it. Cc: Steven Miao Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c index 12528b2..e9e63fc 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c @@ -132,27 +132,23 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) #ifndef CONFIG_BF60x unsigned int plldiv; #endif - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; static unsigned long lpj_ref; static unsigned int lpj_ref_freq; + unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; int ret = 0; #if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE) cycles_t cycles; #endif - freqs.old = bfin_getfreq_khz(0); - freqs.new = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency; + old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(0); + new_freq = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency; - pr_debug("cpufreq: changing cclk to %lu; target = %u, oldfreq = %u\n", - freqs.new, freqs.new, freqs.old); - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); #ifndef CONFIG_BF60x plldiv = (bfin_read_PLL_DIV() & SSEL) | dpm_state_table[index].csel; bfin_write_PLL_DIV(plldiv); #else - ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, freqs.new * 1000); + ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, new_freq * 1000); if (ret != 0) { WARN_ONCE(ret, "cpufreq set freq failed %d\n", ret); return ret; @@ -168,17 +164,13 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) #endif if (!lpj_ref_freq) { lpj_ref = loops_per_jiffy; - lpj_ref_freq = freqs.old; + lpj_ref_freq = old_freq; } - if (freqs.new != freqs.old) { + if (new_freq != old_freq) { loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(lpj_ref, - lpj_ref_freq, freqs.new); + lpj_ref_freq, new_freq); } - /* TODO: just test case for cycles clock source, remove later */ - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - - pr_debug("cpufreq: done\n"); return ret; } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/