Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754457Ab3HPC0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:26:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:32826 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754409Ab3HPC0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:26:43 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Jesper Nilsson , Mikael Starvik , linux-cris-kernel@axis.com Subject: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:55:04 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3179 Lines: 95 Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on frequency change, this one removes it from this driver. Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it. Cc: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Mikael Starvik Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 -------- drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 -------- 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state) { - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl; clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl); - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu); - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency; - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); - local_irq_disable(); /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state) local_irq_enable(); - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu) static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state) { - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl; clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl); - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu); - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency; - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); - local_irq_disable(); /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state) local_irq_enable(); - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - return 0; } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/