Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:05:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:05:12 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:4489 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:05:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:10:46 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Pavel Machek Cc: Hu Gang , Subject: Re: patch for 2.5.42. 2/2 In-Reply-To: <20021014185202.C585@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1117 Lines: 34 On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > > This looks like a serious design mistake. Surely it would be > > better to just have the network layer stop operations when the > > system is going into suspend, instead of having to modify 100 > > individual network drivers ? > > Whole userland is stopped at that point. That should mean that new > requests can not come. > > OTOH packet from the network *can* come, and higher levels can not do > much with that. Higher layers can throw away the packet. This means you just need to modify the higher layer at one or two places, instead of needing to modify every single network driver out there. I don't need to tell you which of these two options is gonna be the easiest to maintain, do I ? regards, Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/