Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:03:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:03:02 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:25869 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:02:47 -0500 Message-ID: <39FDFE0A.BB9691E6@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:02:34 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Keith Owens , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: test10-pre7 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > > > > obj-y is used together with export-objs to split objects into O_OBJS > > (no export symbol) and OX_OBJS (export symbol). If usbcore.o (multi) > > is not replaced by its components then usb.o (in export-objs) is not > > added to OX_OBJS so usb.c gets compiled with the wrong flags which > > causes incorrect module symbols. Multi's in obj-y have to replaced by > > their components before being split into O_OBS and OX_OBJS. > > Your honour, I object. > > What would be wrong with just splitting it the other way, ie make OX_OBJS > be the expanded (but not ordered) list? > > That should take care of it, no? As an aside: remember you mentioned we should try to go 100% OX_OBJS anyway, eliminating O_OBJS completely... -- Jeff Garzik | "Mind if I drive?" -Sam Building 1024 | "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the MandrakeSoft | dash and shrieking like a cheerleader." | -Max - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/