Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:59:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:59:12 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:60916 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:59:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:05:01 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Shailabh Nagar Cc: linux-kernel , linux-aio , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Message-ID: <20021015110501.B11395@redhat.com> References: <3DAB46FD.9010405@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3DAB46FD.9010405@watson.ibm.com>; from nagar@watson.ibm.com on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:36:45PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 678 Lines: 15 On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:36:45PM -0400, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > As of today, there is no scalable alternative to poll/select in the 2.5 > kernel even though the topic has been discussed a number of times > before. The case for a scalable poll has been made often so I won't > get into that. Have you bothered addressing the fact that async poll scales worse than /dev/epoll? That was the original reason for dropping it. -ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/