Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754701Ab3HPNUs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:20:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:44184 "EHLO mail-wg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753042Ab3HPNUm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:20:42 -0400 Message-ID: <520E2726.304@baylibre.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:20:38 +0200 From: Benoit Cousson Organization: BayLibre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Bilovol CC: linux-omap , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , uri.y@variscite.com, Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as a separate dtsi file References: <1376469348-10797-1-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <520B8B45.1010300@baylibre.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2067 Lines: 63 Hi Ruslan, On 16/08/2013 14:04, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Ruslan, >> >> On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just >>> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed >>> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as >>> SDP4430 board >> >> >> The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda >> and Variscite boards before merging it. > > Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I > resubmit this series with > fixed commit message? No, that's fine, I already applied it and fixed the subject and the changelog. Here it is: commit 2e25df1e5a4af906a9b25332719ace000063eb0d Author: Ruslan Bilovol Date: Wed Aug 14 11:35:47 2013 +0300 ARM: dts: twl6030: Move common configuration for OMAP4 boards in a separate dtsi file The OMAP4 SoC family uses specially-designed PMIC (power management IC) companion chip for power management needs: TWL6030/TWL6032. Therefore there is a typical connection of PMIC to OMAP4 so we can move it into separate .dtsi file and do not duplicate over board-specific files. Tested on OMAP4 SDP board and compile-tested for Panda board Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson Just let me know if you are OK with the updated version. > However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not > own any such board so > you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri? It seems that Uri cannot test it right now, so I will have to drop that one. Thanks, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/