Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754107Ab3HPWQH (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:16:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:53188 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536Ab3HPWPC (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:15:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:47:15 -0500 From: Josh Cartwright To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Sagar Dharia , Gilad Avidov , Michael Bohan Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI Message-ID: <20130816194714.GH4035@joshc.qualcomm.com> References: <02deef1d90121011ab1df90ad704ef0ee36e2584.1376596224.git.joshc@codeaurora.org> <20130816184614.GA31510@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130816184614.GA31510@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4768 Lines: 144 Hey Greg- Thanks for the comments. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/of/of_spmi.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2012,2013 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > > + * > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and > > + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > > + * > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + */ > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__ > > As you never make a pr_* call in this file, this line isn't needed. I'll clean these up for v2. > > +static int > > +spmi_read_data(struct spmi_device *sdev, uint8_t *buf, int offset, int cnt) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + int len; > > + uint16_t addr; > > + > > + while (cnt > 0) { > > + addr = offset & 0xFFFF; > > + len = min(cnt, MAX_REG_PER_TRANSACTION); > > + > > + ret = spmi_ext_register_readl(sdev, addr, buf, len); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + pr_err("SPMI read failed, err = %d\n", ret); > > Should be using dev_err() instead. These too. [..] > > + > > + /* Make a copy of the user data */ > > + char *kbuf = kmalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!kbuf) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + ret = copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, count); > > + if (ret == count) { > > + pr_err("failed to copy data from user\n"); > > No need for a message here at all, you will get a message in the > function if something happened wrong. > > Also, shouldn't it just be a simple: > if (copy_from_user()) { > test? Indeed, thanks. [..] > > +void __exit spmi_dfs_exit(void) > > +{ > > + pr_debug("de-initializing spmi debugfs ..."); > > Not needed, use the in-kernel trace functionality if you really want to > know this. Will kill these. > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-dbgfs.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2012-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > > + * > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and > > + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > > + * > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + */ > > +#ifndef _SPMI_DBGFS_H > > +#define _SPMI_DBGFS_H > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > > Why? If debugfs isn't enabled, the functions should just compile away > with the debugfs_() calls, so no need to do this type of thing here, > right? Not sure I follow you, but it may be because this is a bit misleading. Currently CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is being extended to also mean "do you want the SPMI core to create device entries?". It would probably make more sense to have a CONFIG_SPMI_DEBUG option which is def_bool DEBUG_FS, as other busses have. The #ifdef here would then be #ifdef CONFIG_SPMI_DEBUG, as well as in the Makefile: spmi-core-$(CONFIG_SPMI_DEBUG) += spmi-dbgfs.o > > + > > +extern void __init spmi_dfs_init(void); > > +extern void __exit spmi_dfs_exit(void); > > +extern void spmi_dfs_add_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl); > > +extern void spmi_dfs_del_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl); > > +extern void spmi_dfs_add_device(struct spmi_device *sdev); > > +extern void spmi_dfs_del_device(struct spmi_device *sdev); > > + > > +#else > > + > > +static inline void __init spmi_dfs_init(void) { } > > +static inline void __exit spmi_dfs_exit(void) { } > > +static inline void spmi_dfs_add_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl) { } > > +static inline void spmi_dfs_del_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl) { } > > +static inline void spmi_dfs_add_device(struct spmi_device *sdev) { } > > +static inline void spmi_dfs_del_device(struct spmi_device *sdev) { } > > +#endif > > + > > +#endif /* _SPMI_DBGFS_H */ Thanks, Josh -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/