Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:28:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:28:31 -0400 Received: from [129.46.51.58] ([129.46.51.58]:47595 "EHLO numenor.qualcomm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:28:28 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021015093146.05eb7738@mail1.qualcomm.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:02 -0700 To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mingo@elte.hu From: "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200210150157.FAA13254@sex.inr.ac.ru> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 23 At 05:57 AM 10/15/2002 +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: >Hello! > > > But yes, i agree, and there are a number of other > > renames that would make perfect sense. > >Oh, do you dislike names with history? I love them. :-) >Well, bh is short, looks nice and cryptic enough. > >After true BHs have gone, just say that "bh" is alias for "softirq". Sure. Just like I said we can keep compatibility defines #define local_bh_disable local_softirq_disable But primary interface should be changed IMO. Max - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/