Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:01:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:01:01 -0400 Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:6418 "HELO relay.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:01:00 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.73.164 Message-ID: <3DAC4DEB.3E6002E8@kegel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:18:35 -0700 From: Dan Kegel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3custom i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise CC: Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , linux-aio , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 References: <3DAB46FD.9010405@watson.ibm.com> <20021015110501.B11395@redhat.com> <3DAC4B0E.EBB3A2AB@kegel.com> <20021015130311.A14596@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 495 Lines: 15 Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:06:22AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Doesn't the F_SETSIG/F_SETOWN/SIGIO stuff qualify as a scalable > > alternative? > > No. What's the worst part about it? The use of the signal queue? - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/