Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:02:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:02:18 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:40334 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:02:17 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , linux-aio , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 In-Reply-To: <20021015135048.F14596@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 987 Lines: 26 On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:38:53PM -0400, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > > So I guess the question would now be: whats keeping /dev/epoll from > > being included in the kernel given the time left before the feature freeze ? > > We don't need yet another event reporting mechanism as /dev/epoll presents. > I was thinking it should just be its own syscall but report its events in > the same way as aio. Yes, Linus ( like myself ) hates magic inodes inside /dev. At that time it was the fastest way to have a kernel interface exposed w/out having to beg for a syscall. I'm all for a new syscall obviously, and IMHO /dev/epoll might be a nice complement to AIO for specific applications. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/