Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:56:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:56:08 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:37614 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:56:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:02:01 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , linux-aio , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Message-ID: <20021015150201.K14596@redhat.com> References: <3DAC5C11.4060507@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:00:30PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 785 Lines: 20 On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:00:30PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > Something like this might work : > > int sys_epoll_create(int maxfds); > void sys_epoll_close(int epd); > int sys_epoll_wait(int epd, struct pollfd **pevts, int timeout); > > where sys_epoll_wait() return the number of events available, 0 for > timeout, -1 for error. There's no reason to make epoll_wait a new syscall -- poll events can easily be returned via the aio_complete mechanism (with the existing aio_poll experiment as a possible means for doing so). -ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/