Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751628Ab3HTBCN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:02:13 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:15249 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281Ab3HTBCK (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:02:10 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aqMw+FlV c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=F0my4ousGMIA:10 a=3wfm---skdX-aecXHHkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:02:08 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Kent Overstreet , linux-rt-users , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , John Kacur Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3 Message-ID: <20130819210208.426e01b3@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home> References: <20130812163413.GI23040@linutronix.de> <520D212F.7030400@localhost> <20130815152210.5ed93696@gandalf.local.home> <520DCE5F.1040402@linutronix.de> <521254A0.6050603@localhost> <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1053 Lines: 28 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:29:03 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700 > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it > > > just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their > > > definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the > > > right way to do it. > > > So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack? > > I think I'm going to send them an email about that. > Looking at it more, I can now see why they did what they did. Grumble, we may need to bring back the old "compat" rwsem, or whatever we called it, and just use that instead. And say that this code will have no real time boosting. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/