Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750967Ab3HTK0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:26:37 -0400 Received: from mail-out5.uio.no ([129.240.10.17]:55390 "EHLO mail-out5.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821Ab3HTK0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:26:35 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 962 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:26:34 EDT Message-ID: <1376993427.2576.17.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 3.10.{6,7} crashes on network activity From: Georgios Magklaras To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Tom Gundersen , Felix Fietkau , Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Linux Wireless List , LKML , Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:10:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52133DD9.8010902@broadcom.com> References: <20130820000336.GA15548@kroah.com> <20130820002822.GA18023@kroah.com> <5212F6E8.3090107@openwrt.org> <52132589.5000306@broadcom.com> <52133DD9.8010902@broadcom.com> Organization: University of Oslo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 8 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 9 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 2557 max rcpts/h 36 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.2, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.167,UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 1F4FB34CE0B0BC11924947252739C6856EB84441 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.235.130 spam_score: -61 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 3777 max/h 18 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3922 Lines: 112 I verify the same issue on a Latitude E6520 running both the vanilla/clean and the Fedora 19 specific kernels. I thought it was the NVIDIA/nouveau driver and I reproduce by switching to non graphical mode and performing scp transfers. GM On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:58 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 08/20/2013 10:36 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >> On 08/20/2013 06:56 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2013-08-20 2:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:26:11AM +0800, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:59:47AM +0800, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Starting with 3.10.6 (and still present in .7) I get an oops on > >>>>>>> connecting to the network. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The attached picture shows the oops. In case it does not reach the ML, > >>>>>>> the top of the call trace reads: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> brcms_c_compute_rtscts_dur > >>>>>>> brcms_c_ampdu_finalize > >>>>>>> ampdu_finalize > >>>>>>> dma_txfast > >>>>>>> brcms_c_txfifo > >>>>>>> brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211 > >>>>>>> brcms_ops_tx > >>>>>>> __ieee80211_tx > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I bisected the problem and the first bad commit is > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> commit ef47a5e4f1aaf1d0e2e6875e34b2c9595897bef6 > >>>>>>> Author: Felix Fietkau > >>>>>>> Date: Fri Jun 28 21:04:35 2013 +0200 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mac80211/minstrel_ht: fix cck rate sampling > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> commit 1cd158573951f737fbc878a35cb5eb47bf9af3d5 upstream. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Reverting it on top of .7 fixes the problem. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I had the same (I suppose) problem on mainline some time ago, but I > >>>>>>> have not bisected it, verified that the problem still occurs there, or > >>>>>>> checked if reverting the upstream patch fixes it. I'd be happy to do > >>>>>>> that if it would help though. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Let me know if you need any more information. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you have this same problem with 3.11-rc6 as well? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I just confirmed. I also confirmed that reverting the mainline > >>>>> commit on top of -rc6 fixes the problem. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Great, thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Felix and Johannes, any chance we can get this reverted in Linus tree > >>>> soon, and push that revert back to the 3.10 stable tree as well? > >>> > >>> I'd like to avoid a revert, since that will simply replace one set of > >>> issues with another. Let's limit the use of the feature that brcmsmac > >>> can't handle to drivers that are known to work with it. Tom, Please > >>> test this patch to see if it fixes your issue. > >> > >> > >> Hi Felix, > >> > >> I have been diving into root causing why brcmsmac can not handle cck > >> fallback rates, because it should. Maybe it is better to flag no cck support > >> and only change brcmsmac. > > > > Hi Arend, > > > > In case you cannot reproduce, let me know if I can help with testing patches. > > So far I have not been able to reproduce it. I have a patch to avoid the > oops, but the transmit of the related frames will fail in the device so > it is not a real fix. I will let you you know. > > Regards, > Arend > > > Cheers, > > > > Tom > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/