Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:05:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:04:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:17819 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:03:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:20:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: "David S. Miller" Cc: maxk@qualcomm.com, , Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq In-Reply-To: <20021015.131929.103080718.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 899 Lines: 26 On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > _bh is not a "base handler" it stands for "bottom half". > > "base handler" and "bottom half" all refer to an execution context, > and these days that means softirq. i think i agree with you. - we have 'top half' contexts, which are also called 'hardirqs'. - then we have 'bottom half' contexts, which are also called 'softirqs'. the fact that 'bottom halves' used to be an earlier concept that had a slightly different meaning from 'softirqs' for a limited amount of time does not remove from the meaningfulness of the naming itself. Today 'bottom halves' and 'softirqs' are the same thing. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/