Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752028Ab3HTRiS (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:38:18 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:41495 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339Ab3HTRiR (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:38:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1377020294.2016.51.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: Why are BSD-licensed LZ4 symbols GPL exported? From: Joe Perches To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Richard Yao , chanho.min@lge.com, Kernel development list Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:38:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130820171148.GA17832@srcf.ucam.org> References: <520D8C4C.7000704@gentoo.org> <20130820171148.GA17832@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 917 Lines: 21 On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:19:56PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > > Why are the LZ4 symbols being GPL-exported when the LZ4 code is > > BSD-licensed and no substantial changes appear to have been made when it > > was merged? > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended an indication that using a symbol is > likely to result in you producing a derived work of the kernel, and the > kernel as a whole is under the GPL. It has nothing to do with additional > licenses that individual pieces of code may be available under. Maybe not. http://www.ifross.org/en/artikel/ongoing-dispute-over-value-exportsymbolgpl-function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/