Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751776Ab3HTTwx (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:52:53 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:41819 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633Ab3HTTww (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:52:52 -0400 Message-ID: <5213C90F.9010407@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:52:47 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Hesselbarth CC: Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 02/17] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init References: <1376964271-22715-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1376964271-22715-3-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <52138F56.6030008@wwwdotorg.org> <5213C7E1.4070401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5213C7E1.4070401@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1531 Lines: 32 On 08/20/2013 01:47 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 08/20/2013 05:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/19/2013 08:04 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>> Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before >>> timers. >>> Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right >>> before >>> clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the >>> default >>> hook instead. clk_of_init now checks for multiple calls to it, so add >>> the call to ARM arch time_init by default. >> >> Some SoCs call this function in .init_irq() rather than .init_time(). >> Perhaps we adjust this patch to do that instead. That way, we can >> presumably get rid of patch 1/17 since we can eliminate any duplicate >> calls, and adjust patch 14/17 (Tegra board file) to remove its custom >> call to of_clock_init(NULL)? > > Currently as of -next from yesterday, only tegra is requiring clocks > that early, while others are fine with them close to timers. I really > have no strong opinion on that. That decision should rather be made > by those with a far more complete insight of the consequences than I > have. Perhaps if Tegra is a special-case, it shouldn't rely on the generic init_time() callback, and hence you could still eliminate patch 1/17? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/